Did the Roman Empire Have an Official State Poisoner on the Imperial Payroll?

Yes — the Roman Empire had an official state poisoner on the imperial payroll. Her name was Locusta of Gaul, and she was already sitting in a Roman prison on poisoning charges when Empress Agrippina had her released in 54 AD to murder Emperor Claudius. Nero then kept her on retainer, granted her country estates, issued her a full imperial pardon, and had her run a school training new assassins in his service. She operated with the explicit sanction of the Roman state for over a decade — until Nero fell, and the new emperor had her executed.

This article contains affiliate links. Hidden World may earn a small commission on purchases made through these links, at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR Locusta of Gaul was already in a Roman prison for poisoning when Empress Agrippina had her released in 54 AD to murder Emperor Claudius. Nero then kept her on retainer as an official court poisoner, granted her country estates, and had her run a school training new assassins in his service.

Her story occupies only a handful of lines across the works of Tacitus, Suetonius, and Cassius Dio. She left no writings of her own. But those sparse accounts are enough to sketch a portrait of someone who turned a forbidden expertise into a career inside the most powerful institution on earth — and who, for a time, operated with the full sanction of the Roman state.

From Gaul to Rome

Locusta came from Gaul, a territory that encompassed what is now France and parts of neighboring countries. She grew up with a working knowledge of herbs and botany — the kind of rural expertise that, in the right hands, could cure or kill. How she ended up in Rome is not recorded with certainty. One possibility is that she was taken as a slave; Julius Caesar's campaigns in Gaul a century earlier had produced an enormous slave trade, and Roman soldiers continued bringing captives west into the imperial capital. What is clear is that once she arrived in Rome, she found a market for her skills. In a city saturated with political ambition, personal vendettas, and concentrated wealth, there was never a shortage of people who wanted someone else dead and who lacked the stomach to do it themselves.

Brisk business eventually drew the attention of Roman law. By 54 AD Locusta was in custody, already notorious and imprisoned on poisoning charges. Her career might have ended there — except that word of her abilities had reached someone far more dangerous than any magistrate. Empress Agrippina the Younger, wife of Emperor Claudius and mother of the young Nero, had a problem that required a professional. The full story of how Rome's poisoners operated in this period is reconstructed in Locusta, the Poisoner of Rome: The Silent Weapon of Imperial Power, which traces her career from her Gaulish origins through the courts of Agrippina and Nero.

The Death of an Emperor

Agrippina's situation was precarious. She had steered her son Nero toward adoption by Claudius, positioning him as heir to the throne. But Claudius had a biological son — Britannicus, from his previous marriage — who represented a standing threat to those plans. Fearing that Claudius might move to favor Britannicus more openly, Agrippina decided to act. She had Locusta released from prison and put to work.

The plan involved poisoned mushrooms — Claudius's favorite food — prepared by Locusta and served to the emperor by his food taster Halotus, who was in on the scheme. The mushroom dose failed to kill Claudius outright, leaving him ill but alive. What followed was one of the more grotesque improvisations in the history of political murder. Claudius's personal physician, Gaius Stertinius Xenophon, intervened on the pretense of helping the emperor vomit by inserting a feather down his throat — a standard medical technique of the era. The feather had been laced with poison. Claudius died in the early hours of October 13, 54 AD.

The full record of these events, as Tacitus documented them, is preserved in Annals of Imperial Rome (Penguin Classics), which covers the reigns of Claudius and Nero in full. Tacitus's account notes that Agrippina had long decided on the crime and wanted a compound that would cloud Claudius's mind while slowly ending his life — a precise brief for a professional poisoner.

Nero's Instrument

Nero became emperor at seventeen. His stepbrother Britannicus was not yet fourteen but represented a rival with a blood claim to the throne that Nero's adoption could never fully extinguish. In 55 AD, Nero turned to Locusta. He was not a patient employer. When her first preparation for Britannicus worked too slowly for his liking, Nero flogged her and threatened immediate execution. She responded by producing a faster-acting compound.

Suetonius records what happened next. Britannicus's food was routinely tasted before it reached him — a standard precaution for anyone in the imperial household. Locusta's solution was to bypass the food entirely. The poison was administered via cold water added to Britannicus's drink at a dinner party; the water was tasted separately and deemed safe, since the dose was not in it at that point. Once combined with the hot food on his plate, the cold water carried the poison to Britannicus directly. He began convulsing. Nero told those at the table not to intervene, suggesting it was merely an epileptic episode. Britannicus died at the dinner. The complete account of this and the rest of Nero's reign appears in The Twelve Caesars by Suetonius, translated by Robert Graves, which remains the most accessible primary source on Nero's character and methods.

The Official Poisoner

After Britannicus's death, Nero's attitude toward Locusta shifted from that of a hostile client to something resembling gratitude. He freed her from any remaining legal jeopardy with a full imperial pardon. He granted her large country estates, with servants to attend to her. And then he did something that has no real parallel in the documented history of any ancient state: he had her establish a school.

Nero sent students to Locusta, and she taught them — the preparation of poisons, the properties of plants, the techniques of administration, the means of defeating the standard precautions that powerful Romans kept in place. The empire, in other words, had an officially sanctioned curriculum in assassination, running on an imperial subsidy, out of a building on an estate awarded to its teacher by the reigning emperor. Whether this operation was large or small, how many students passed through it, or whether those students went on to active service is not recorded. What is recorded is that it existed.

Walking the ground where these events played out — the Palatine Hill where the imperial palaces stood, the Roman Forum where political life converged — gives the story a different kind of weight. A guided tour of the Colosseum, Roman Forum, and Palatine Hill covers the core of imperial Rome in a single visit, with commentary on the political intrigues and power structures that made someone like Locusta both necessary and possible.

The End of Nero's Rome

Nero's reign collapsed under the weight of his own excesses. By 68 AD the Senate had turned against him and armies across the empire were declaring for rival candidates. Nero committed suicide rather than face capture — reportedly carrying a poison that Locusta had prepared for exactly this eventuality, though in the end he used a blade instead. With Nero gone, the protection he had extended to his associates evaporated instantly.

The new emperor, Galba, moved quickly against those closest to the old regime. Locusta was arrested along with several of Nero's other close associates. Cassius Dio recorded what Galba decreed: that they were to be led in chains through the entire city of Rome and then executed. He described the group as "the scum that had come to the surface in Nero's day." Locusta died in 69 AD. The school, the estates, the pardon — all of it gone within a year of her patron's death.

For those drawn to the darker layers of Rome's history, an underground tour offers a different perspective on the city's relationship with death. A guided visit to Rome's catacombs and the Capuchin Crypt covers burial sites and bone chapels that reflect how Romans across different eras thought about mortality — the same mortality that Locusta dispensed on request for over a decade.

How much of this is reliable?

There is a reasonable argument for skepticism. Every ancient historian who wrote about Locusta was doing so after Nero's fall, in a political environment that had strong incentives to portray the dead emperor as comprehensively monstrous. Among Roman cultural values, poison occupied a specific symbolic register: it was considered a cowardly, feminine weapon, unsuited to men of honor who should confront their enemies directly. An account depicting Nero as someone who relied on a woman to commit his murders served a rhetorical purpose beyond simple historical documentation. It was a deliberate insult framed as a factual record.

None of this means Locusta did not exist, or that she had no role in the deaths attributed to her. Historical consensus holds that Claudius was almost certainly murdered and that Britannicus was poisoned. What remains open is how large her specific contribution was, and how much her story was embellished in the retelling. She left no account of her own. The women who may have known the full truth — Agrippina included — were also dead before the histories were written.

Was Locusta the world's first documented serial killer?

Some historians have applied this label to her, noting that she killed repeatedly, across a sustained period, under conditions that resemble what modern criminology identifies as serial homicide. The claim is difficult to evaluate precisely because the sources are incomplete — we know about the deaths of Claudius and Britannicus, but we have no reliable count of how many others she may have poisoned during her years on Nero's retainer. "Serial killer" is a modern forensic category applied backward across two thousand years of fragmentary evidence. What can be said more safely is that Locusta was a professional, that she killed for hire, and that she did so repeatedly enough to train successors in her methods.

What poisons did Locusta use?

The ancient sources point to substances derived from plants that were well understood in the Roman world. Atropa belladonna was reportedly the poison used in the feather that killed Claudius — a plant with a documented history in Roman poisoning cases going back well before Locusta's time. Arsenic and death cap mushrooms also appear in accounts of her methods. These were not exotic or novel substances; they were available to anyone with botanical knowledge. What Locusta offered was expertise in dosage, timing, and administration — the difference between killing someone and merely making them ill, or between a death that looked natural and one that immediately raised suspicion.

Why did Nero keep Locusta on retainer rather than eliminating her?

The simplest answer is utility. A functioning imperial court in the first century AD was an environment of constant threat, real and imagined, and a reliable poisoner with a track record of success was a strategic asset. Locusta knew things — about the deaths she had facilitated, about the clients who had hired her before the imperial connection, about the methods she had developed. She was more valuable alive and employed than dead and replaced. Nero's decision to have her train additional poisoners reflects a belief that this expertise needed to be institutionalized, not kept as a single individual's secret. The school was, in its way, a professional development program for state-sanctioned murder.

What happened to Locusta's school after her death?

The sources do not say. Galba's purge focused on visible associates of Nero, and Locusta is among those specifically named as having been arrested and executed. Whether her students scattered, continued operating independently, or were also rounded up is not recorded. Her name became a byword for poisoning in Roman popular culture for generations after her death — Juvenal references her in his Satires as a common shorthand for hired killing. The school itself disappears from the record entirely after 69 AD.